RACGP CCE case discussion versus clinical encounter

Start with the task in front of you

You can know a topic well and still find a CCE case difficult to deliver. Sometimes the obstacle is the task: you are explaining your decisions to an examiner when the case asks you to speak with a patient, or conducting an imaginary consultation when the examiner has asked for your reasoning. Preparation should give you deliberate practice in both situations.

PassGP’s principle is simple: You know the medicine. We teach you the exam. For the CCE, that includes learning how to make your clinical knowledge useful to the person listening.

What changes between the two formats

The RACGP currently describes nine CCE cases: four case discussions and five clinical encounters, delivered online through Zoom. Each case has five minutes of reading time followed by 15 minutes of assessment. In a case discussion, you discuss the scenario with the examiner. In a clinical encounter, you interact with a role-player while an examiner observes.

Read the instructions as a specific job to complete. The candidate guidelines explain that case discussions contain questions and that examiners may prompt or probe an answer. Practise answering the question asked before expanding into related issues. Check the latest candidate guidance before your sitting.

One original case with two different jobs

Consider this original teaching scenario. Priya, 39, presents with recurrent headaches over three weeks. She has been taking over-the-counter pain relief and is worried because a colleague recently received a serious diagnosis. You have no examination findings yet. A discussion task asks you to explain your initial assessment. An encounter task asks you to explore Priya’s symptoms and concerns.

The scenario deliberately leaves important information missing. Healthdirect identifies sudden severe headache and features such as confusion or neck stiffness as reasons for emergency assessment. Ask about concerning features early, alongside the symptom pattern, medicine use and impact on daily life. A short stem cannot establish a benign diagnosis.

Make your reasoning audible in the discussion

For this drill, organise your opening around what you need to establish first, what information would change your assessment, and what you would do with that information. You could begin: ‘I need to establish whether this headache needs urgent assessment, then characterise the pattern and understand Priya’s concern.’ That gives your listener a clear route through the answer.

Next, connect selected questions to their purpose. ‘I would clarify exactly how the headache began because abrupt severe onset changes the urgency.’ Follow with the examination you would arrange and explain how findings would influence your next step. Avoid filling gaps with invented normal results. If you cannot choose an investigation yet, identify the missing information and explain how you would obtain it.

When you rehearse, ask your partner to stop you after a broad phrase such as ‘I would exclude red flags’. Your job is to turn that phrase into a relevant question, finding or action.

Let the patient shape the encounter

Now practise the encounter opening. Ask Priya to describe what has been happening, then use focused questions to clarify the clinical picture. When she mentions her colleague, respond to that information: ‘What has worried you most about your own headaches?’ Listen before you launch into an explanation.

For this exercise, your partner should reveal the concern only when the conversation gives them room. Notice whether you return to it after gathering the relevant history. You might summarise: ‘You’ve had these headaches for three weeks, and the uncertainty has been particularly worrying since your colleague became unwell.’ Then check that you have understood correctly.

Practise explaining the next assessment step in everyday language. Leave space for questions. If your explanation assumes findings that have never been supplied, stop and repair it. That is a useful rehearsal habit for any incomplete clinical scenario.

Try the two opening drill

Give yourself five minutes to read the scenario. Record a three-minute discussion answer, then a three-minute encounter with a study partner. These are short practice segments, not substitutes for full-length cases. Review whether the discussion links actions to reasons and whether the encounter actually responds to Priya’s answers.

Repeat only the weaker opening before moving on. PassGP’s AI Oral Examiner supports structured spoken practice; use that kind of rehearsal alongside guideline revision and colleague feedback. The practical aim is a clear, adaptable response that fits the task you have actually been given.

Explore PassGP’s CCE Clinical Exam Bank and choose a case to practise aloud in both formats.

Explore CCE preparation